More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
Marvel’s She-Hulk: Attorney at Law was one of the most anticipated series in the Marvel Cinematic Universe when it premiered on Disney+ in August 2022. Fans were drawn in by Tatiana Maslany’s take on Jennifer Walters—a smart, sharp Los Angeles lawyer who suddenly finds herself transformed into a 6-foot-7-inch green superhero after a freak accident involving her cousin, Bruce Banner. The show immediately stood out for its mix of legal drama, action, and comedy, but also for how it leaned into meta-humor and broke the fourth wall, with Walters speaking directly to viewers, questioning the narrative, and even confronting the writers in the finale.
This fresh approach, inspired by John Byrne’s comic run and the irreverent style of shows like Fleabag, landed with many fans who were ready for a more self-aware, comedic entry in the MCU’s sprawling universe. Jennifer Walters’ struggles—balancing her demanding job at the firm Goodman, Lieber, Kurtzberg & Holliway, navigating dating apps, and wrestling with what it means to be a public superhero—felt relatable and contemporary. The show quickly became one of Marvel Studios' best-performing Disney+ series, with Samba TV reporting 1.5 million U.S. households streamed the premiere in its first four days, more than double the numbers for Ms. Marvel’s debut.
But almost as soon as She-Hulk started streaming, backlash began brewing in the MCU fandom. Criticism appeared on social media platforms, review sites, and online forums. Some viewers targeted the show’s tone, arguing it leaned too heavily on humor and self-referential jokes at the expense of traditional superhero action. Others focused on the visual effects used to bring She-Hulk to life, with debate erupting over whether the CGI met the cinematic standards established by earlier Marvel properties.
Yet the most intense controversy centered around the show’s feminist perspective and its willingness to address misogyny directly—both within the story and in real-world superhero fandoms. The writers, led by Jessica Gao, anticipated negative reactions as early as 2019, incorporating real-life Internet troll comments into the script. In the series, Walters faces online hate and targeted harassment from a group called Intelligencia—a storyline reflecting actual experiences of female leads and creators in genre properties.
The backlash escalated as episodes aired. On review aggregator sites, She-Hulk was subjected to “review bombing,” where coordinated groups of users flooded platforms with negative ratings. On Rotten Tomatoes, the show maintained a high critical score—87% approval based on 136 reviews for the premiere—but user scores lagged far behind, a pattern seen in other genre titles facing similar controversies. The divide between critics’ and fans’ reactions became a talking point itself, with some accusing detractors of bad faith criticism driven by bias rather than genuine issues with the show’s quality.
Part of the answer lies in the show’s explicit decision to poke fun at Marvel fandom itself. Walters’ story includes moments where she addresses fan expectations—not just for superhero stories, but also for how female characters are written and perceived. In the season finale, Walters literally steps out of her narrative to confront an artificial intelligence called K.E.V.I.N., a tongue-in-cheek nod to Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige, and argues for a different, more character-driven ending. This daring meta-approach divided opinion: some loved the boldness, others felt the show was mocking long-time fans or dismissing their investment in the MCU’s established formula.
The show’s depiction of online misogyny and toxic fandom wasn’t just a passing reference. In episode six, Walters and her friend Nikki Ramos discover a message board called Intelligencia filled with threats and hate directed at She-Hulk, echoing real-world forums known for similar behavior. The head of Intelligencia in the series, Todd Phelps, is portrayed as a billionaire playboy driven by wounded ego and entitlement, a deliberate commentary on the power dynamics and gendered backlash faced by women in pop culture.
The effects of this backlash have been felt by the cast and creative team. Tatiana Maslany, praised by critics for her performance, became a focus of both praise and vitriol online. Head writer Jessica Gao has spoken about the emotional toll of anticipating negative reactions and intentionally weaving those themes into the writing, making the response both personal and self-referential.
Fans on both sides of the divide have been affected. Many female viewers and fans from marginalized groups found She-Hulk’s take on public scrutiny and online harassment painfully relatable, and celebrated its willingness to tackle those issues head-on. Others felt alienated by the show’s meta-commentary or disagreed with its tonal choices, leading to drawn-out arguments over what constitutes “real” Marvel storytelling and who gets to decide what fits within the MCU canon.
Is the criticism leveled at She-Hulk fair? Some critiques—such as the uneven visual effects—were echoed by reviewers and viewers alike, pointing to the technical challenges of rendering a lead character who is entirely CGI in almost every scene. Others, like the backlash against the show’s feminist themes or its fourth-wall-breaking humor, often overlap with larger discussions about the evolving identity of superhero franchises and the expectations of their most passionate fans.
The community is still debating several unresolved questions. Should superhero properties stick to established formulas, or is there room for experimentation, especially when it comes to tone and storytelling devices? How much should creators engage with or respond to online criticism, and what happens when fandom voices cross the line from critique into harassment? Is it possible for a series to be both a successful comedy and a meaningful superhero story, or does trying to do both risk alienating core segments of the fanbase?
As new Marvel projects continue to push boundaries and experiment with genre, will the fandom become more accepting of change—or will every bold new direction spark another round of controversy?