More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
At 6:30 in the morning, on December 1, 1948, a couple walking along Somerton Park beach near Adelaide found a man’s body slumped against the seawall, legs stretched out in the sand, with his head propped oddly. He wore a crisp suit with all the tags cut out, and in the fob pocket of his trousers, sewn shut and almost invisible, police later found a tiny scrap of paper. On it, in neat print, were two words: “Tamám Shud.” In Persian, it means “It is finished.” The phrase had been torn from the last page of a rare edition of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám, a collection of poetry about living life without regret.
The discovery soon spiraled into one of Australia’s most perplexing mysteries. The dead man, quickly dubbed the “Somerton Man,” was estimated by the pathologist John Burton Cleland to be between 40 and 45 years old and in excellent physical condition. He was 180 centimeters tall—just under 5 feet 11 inches—had light brown to ginger hair, gray eyes, and a clean-shaven face with no scars, birthmarks, or distinguishing features. His hands and nails were soft, showing no signs of manual labor, and his feet had high arches and wedge-shaped toes, traits seen in dancers or those who regularly wore pointed boots.
Details from the scene sharpened the mystery. The man’s shoes were recently polished, his clothes were of high quality, and he carried nothing to identify himself—no wallet, no hat, which was unusual for a man in a suit in 1948, no labels on his clothes, and no personal papers. In his pockets, police found a used bus ticket to Glenelg, an unused train ticket to Henley Beach, a narrow aluminum comb made in the United States, a half-empty packet of Juicy Fruit gum, a box of Bryant & May matches, and a cigarette pack containing a different brand than the label. Every possible clue seemed designed to lead nowhere.
Witnesses came forward to say they’d seen someone resembling the deceased lying in that very spot the previous evening. Around 7 p.m., one couple saw him stretch out his right arm, then let it fall limply. Another couple watched from 7:30 p.m. to 8 p.m., noting he didn’t budge despite swarms of mosquitoes. They thought he was just drunk or asleep and didn’t check further. The man was discovered the next morning in the same peculiar position.
An autopsy performed soon after revealed more abnormalities. The pathologist John Dwyer reported that the man’s heart was of normal size, but there was unusual congestion in his brain, liver, and kidneys, and his spleen was three times the normal size. There was blood mixed with food in his stomach—his last meal, a pasty, had been eaten three to four hours before death. There were no signs of external violence and no unusual substances detected, but Dwyer concluded, “I am quite convinced the death could not have been natural… the poison I suggested was a barbiturate or a soluble hypnotic.” Toxicology failed to identify any trace of poison, even though acute poisoning remained the prime theory.
The police tried to identify the man, but his fingerprints did not match any in the Australian national database. Photographs and details were circulated internationally. The FBI in the United States and Scotland Yard in the United Kingdom compared prints and features but found no matches. In the days and weeks after the discovery, newspapers such as The Advertiser and The News published appeals and photographs. A man named E.C. Johnson saw his name mentioned as a possible victim and turned up at the police station to confirm he was alive, just one of several false leads. Over the next months, at least eight different people claimed to know the man’s identity, but every lead fizzled. In January 1949, two people identified the body as that of Robert Walsh, a 63-year-old woodcutter, but forensic checks on scars and build quickly ruled him out.
On January 14, 1949, the case took a twist when staff at the Adelaide railway station found a brown suitcase, its label removed, checked into the station cloakroom around 11 a.m. on November 30—the day before the body was found. Inside, police discovered a red-checked dressing gown, a pair of red felt slippers, four pairs of underpants, pajamas, shaving equipment, a light brown pair of trousers with sand in the cuffs, an electrician’s screwdriver, a table knife shortened into a sharp instrument, a pair of scissors with sharpened points, a small zinc square sheath, and a stenciling brush used by ship’s officers for marking cargo.
The suitcase offered a few tantalizing threads. There was a card of orange Barbour brand waxed thread, an “unusual type” not sold in Australia at the time, exactly matching the repair in the lining of the dead man’s trousers. A coat in the case featured a style of featherstitching and gusset unique to American tailoring, suggesting travel or connections abroad. But all labels had been removed from the clothes—except for the name “T. Keane” on a tie, “Keane” on a laundry bag, and “Kean” on a singlet, plus three dry-cleaning marks: 1171/7, 4393/7, and 3053/7. Police believed these names were left intentionally, a deliberate red herring, as no missing person named T. Keane could be found anywhere in the English-speaking world.
The mystery deepened dramatically when, months after the initial autopsy, a secret pocket in the man's trousers yielded the tiny "Tamám Shud" slip. This led detectives to search for the book it came from. After a public appeal, a man—never publicly identified—turned over a copy of the Rubáiyát of Omar Khayyám that had been left in his unlocked car on Jetty Road in Glenelg, the same suburb where the body appeared. The last page of the book had the words "Tamám Shud" torn out, and microscopic tests confirmed the slip matched this page.
Even stranger, on the inside back cover of the book, detectives found faint pencil indentations. These included a local telephone number, another unidentified number, and several lines of capital letters that appeared to form a code: WRGOABABD, MLIAOI, WTBIMPANETP, MLIABOAIAQC, ITTMTSAMSTGAB. The second line had been struck out. Despite efforts by Department of Defence cryptographers and amateur codebreakers over decades, no one has ever cracked this code, and some experts concluded it might simply be a private mnemonic or shorthand.
The phone number traced to Jessica Ellen “Jo” Thomson, a nurse living on Moseley Street, about 400 meters from where the body was found. When police questioned her, she claimed not to know the man or why her number would be linked. She also reported that, in late 1948, an unknown man had asked her neighbor about her. When shown the cast of the dead man’s face, Jessica Thomson swayed as if about to faint, but denied recognition. She asked for her name to be kept confidential, fearing embarrassment and damage to her reputation. Police agreed, which complicated future investigations.
Investigators briefly pursued the theory that the Somerton Man was Alf Boxall, a lieutenant Thomson had known during the war, to whom she had given a copy of the Rubáiyát in 1945. But Boxall was found alive in Sydney, with his book intact—the “Tamám Shud” page unaltered.
Despite public fascination, frequent press coverage, and international police collaboration, the case went cold. The coroner, Thomas Erskine Cleland, could not rule on the identity or the cause of death. Cedric Stanton Hicks, a professor of pharmacology, testified that certain rare cardiac glycoside poisons—digitalis and ouabain—could cause death in tiny doses and be nearly undetectable, but no conclusive trace was ever found.
After the inquest, authorities buried the unidentified man at West Terrace Cemetery on June 14, 1949, with the Salvation Army officiating and the South Australian Grandstand Bookmakers Association paying for the service to avoid a pauper’s grave. For years, fresh flowers appeared on the grave, left by a woman never identified.
By the 2010s, the case had provoked thousands of pages of internet speculation, but the Australian police maintained only minimal community involvement. Contemporary efforts focused on DNA analysis of hair preserved in a plaster bust of the dead man’s head, made in 1949. Professor Derek Abbott at the University of Adelaide launched a new wave of inquiry, using genetic genealogy to analyze mitochondrial DNA. His team identified a haplogroup found in only 1% of Europeans, and in 2022, Abbott announced a plausible identification: Carl “Charles” Webb, an electrical engineer born in 1905 in Melbourne. However, South Australia Police and Forensic Science South Australia have not verified the result, and some experts question whether degraded DNA from old hair can provide certainty.
Key evidence has vanished over the years. The brown suitcase was destroyed in 1986. Witness statements and the original autopsy reports are missing from police files. Embalming chemicals likely ruined much of the Somerton Man’s DNA.
Despite decades of investigation, the following question remains: Why did the Somerton Man travel to Adelaide, cut the labels from his clothes, conceal a Persian phrase in his pocket, and carry a code that no one has cracked?