More from this creator
Other episodes by Kitty Cat.
More like this
If you liked this, try these.
Transcript
The full episode, in writing.
Dan Reed was born in 1964 in the United Kingdom. He grew up during a period when the British documentary tradition was being shaped by the direct cinema movement and political investigative films on television. This environment, marked by a culture that valued journalistic exposé and social critique, influenced Reed’s approach to documentary filmmaking, leading him to seek out stories that provoked public debate and challenged powerful figures.
Reed’s formative influences included the BBC’s investigative reporting and Channel 4’s willingness to tackle taboo subjects. Entering adulthood as the UK’s media environment shifted away from deference to celebrities and authority, Reed developed a skepticism that would later define his filmmaking style. He was particularly shaped by the critical reception and public fallout that surrounded controversial documentary events, such as the 1995 broadcast of The Cook Report’s sting operations. Reed built a reputation for approaching delicate subjects with a meticulous, narrative-driven style, prioritizing the voices of individuals whose stories had been marginalized.
In 2017, Channel 4’s editors approached Reed with the idea for a documentary focusing on allegations made by Wade Robson and James Safechuck, both of whom had been involved in lawsuits against Michael Jackson’s estate. Reed conducted his first interviews with Robson in Hawaii, overcoming technical setbacks when a camera failed early in production. He continued with Safechuck in Los Angeles, laying the groundwork for a film that would chart the men’s stories chronologically and without omissions.
Leaving Neverland debuted at Sundance in January 2019, before airing in two parts on HBO in the United States and Channel 4 in the United Kingdom in March 2019. The full version was 236 minutes long, while the British broadcast was trimmed to 189 minutes to allow for commercial breaks. The documentary detailed allegations of abuse—Safechuck claimed it happened from 1988 to 1992, and Robson from 1990 to 1996—with both men describing their experiences at Jackson’s Neverland Ranch and at other locations. The film included graphic accounts and explored the emotional manipulation they alleged Jackson used, including separating them from their families and encouraging secrecy.
The airing of Leaving Neverland triggered a backlash against Jackson’s music, with several radio stations—such as all Cogeco-owned stations in Canada and MediaWorks New Zealand—temporarily removing his songs from their playlists. However, the backlash was not uniform; after some time, many of these stations reintroduced Jackson’s music following positive listener surveys. Despite the controversy, sales and streams of Jackson’s music actually increased: combined music sales rose by 10% and his videos were viewed 22.1 million times in the week following the US broadcast, an increase of roughly 1.2 million from the previous week. Three of his albums re-entered the UK iTunes chart at that time.
In response to the documentary, Michael Jackson’s estate condemned Leaving Neverland as a “tabloid character assassination.” The estate’s legal team, led by attorney Howard Weitzman, asserted that both Robson and Safechuck had previously testified under oath that Jackson never molested them. The estate also cited the lack of independent evidence supporting the claims. Shortly before the HBO broadcast, Weitzman wrote a letter to HBO chief executive Richard Plepler criticizing the documentary’s journalistic ethics and alleging it was part of the accusers’ legal strategies, as both Robson and Safechuck had active lawsuits against the estate at the time.
This legal pushback escalated into a lawsuit. On February 21, 2019, the Jackson estate sued HBO for $100 million, alleging that airing the film violated a non-disparagement clause in a 1992 contract relating to a previous Michael Jackson concert special. The Jackson estate argued that the clause should prevent HBO from broadcasting any content that could harm Jackson’s reputation, even posthumously. HBO countered that the contract had expired, but a federal judge ruled in favor of the estate, compelling HBO to enter arbitration. In December 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision.
Leaving Neverland won the Primetime Emmy Award for Outstanding Documentary or Nonfiction Special, the TCA Award for Outstanding Achievement in News and Information, and was sold to broadcasters in 130 territories. Its premiere on Channel 4 broke streaming records, with Part 1 drawing an audience of 2.1 million and Part 2 attracting 1.9 million in the UK. In the US, Part 1 drew 1.285 million viewers—making it the third-largest audience for an HBO documentary in that decade.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film holds a 98% approval rating from critics. The Guardian, Rolling Stone, and Vanity Fair praised the documentary’s emotional depth and narrative. However, some reviewers, including those writing for Entertainment Weekly and The Daily Telegraph, criticized it as one-sided, pointing out that it included no voices from Jackson’s estate or defenders.
Backlash also came from Jackson’s family and supporters, who produced their own documentaries in response. Neverland Firsthand: Investigating the Michael Jackson Documentary was released on YouTube on March 30, 2019. Produced by Liam McEwan and directed by Eli Pedraza, it featured interviews with Jackson’s nephew Taj Jackson, niece Brandi Jackson, private investigator Scott Ross, and technical director Brad Sundberg. Brandi Jackson claimed to have dated Wade Robson and described him as “a bit of an opportunist,” while Ross stated that Safechuck’s allegations about being asked to testify at Jackson’s 2005 trial were inaccurate because the judge had barred such evidence, and Safechuck had never actually been asked to testify. The documentary argued that key information had been excluded from Leaving Neverland, undermining the credibility of the accusers’ claims.
Several high-profile figures and former friends of Jackson, including Corey Feldman and Macaulay Culkin, publicly denied ever witnessing or experiencing inappropriate behavior by Jackson. Culkin stated he had no reason to conceal anything after Jackson’s death, and Feldman described his own childhood relationship with Jackson as following the “standard grooming process” up until the point where others alleged sexual activity had occurred—but insisted that, for him, it never did.
Legal judgments on the Robson and Safechuck cases shifted over time. Both men had previously testified in Jackson’s defense—Robson in 1993 and 2005, Safechuck in 1993—and had denied any abuse. Their lawsuits, filed in 2013 and 2014 respectively, sought damages from Jackson’s estate and his business entities. These were dismissed multiple times due to statute of limitations and lack of evidence that Jackson’s companies had a duty to protect them. In 2023, an appellate court revived the cases, and as of the latest developments, their combined suit, Safechuck v. MJJ Productions, is scheduled for a jury trial in November 2026, with $400 million in damages sought from the estate.
Some fans organized protests, crowdfunding campaigns, and public advertisements with the slogan “Facts don’t lie. People do.” Others, including the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, called the documentary a “posthumous lynching.” The backlash included abusive messages and death threats directed at Dan Reed and the accusers.
Industry reactions also included the removal of Jackson’s name from certain products and events. The fashion house Louis Vuitton canceled Jackson-inspired designs for its 2019 collections. A planned London concert produced by Quincy Jones omitted Jackson’s name from advertisements. The Children’s Museum of Indianapolis removed some Jackson memorabilia, while items from their Ryan White exhibit were retained.
Despite the media storm and calls for “canceling” Jackson, his sales and influence persisted. Industry executives noted in 2019 that Jackson’s memorabilia remained highly valuable, and his legacy continued to be debated, with biographer Margo Jefferson emphasizing the complexity of reconciling his art and alleged misconduct.